These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Beyond access: acceptability, use and nonuse of emergency contraception among young women.
    Author: Rocca CH, Schwarz EB, Stewart FH, Darney PD, Raine TR, Harper CC.
    Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 196(1):29.e1-6; discussion 90.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17240221.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the acceptability of levonorgestrel emergency contraception (EC). STUDY DESIGN: We examined attitudes and use patterns among 1950 women in a randomized trial evaluating access to EC through advance provision, pharmacies, or clinics. RESULTS: Most women considered EC to be safe (92%) and effective (98%). Compared with women with clinic access, women with direct pharmacy access were no more likely to use EC within 24 hours (odds ratio [OR] = 1.65, 95% CI = 0.82-3.30) or to report it very convenient (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.77-2.56). However, women with advance provisions were more likely to use EC promptly (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.24-4.80) and report high convenience (OR = 4.25, 95% CI = 2.32-7.76). Advance provision increased use by all women, whereas pharmacy access increased use only among condom users. Inconvenience and fear of side effects were common reasons for nonuse. CONCLUSION: Women viewed EC favorably. Advance provision improved promptness and convenience of use overall, while pharmacy access benefited specific populations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]