These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with and without extra-articular supplementation by quadricipital tendon plasty: seven-year follow-up].
    Author: Giraud B, Besse JL, Cladière F, Ecochard R, Moyen B, Lerat JL.
    Journal: Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2006 Dec; 92(8):788-97. PubMed ID: 17245238.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common procedure, but use of lateral reinforcement is still a subject of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare two randomized series of ACL reconstructions, one using an intra-articular method (patellar tendon autograft) and the other an intra- and extra-articular method (Mac-InJones). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 1995 to March 1998, 63 knees underwent surgery for ACL reconstruction. Inclusion criteria was significant medial differential laxity measured between 7 and 12 mm on passive dynamic x-rays as 20 degrees flexion. Group 1 (patellar tendon intra-articular reconstruction) included 34 patients (27.1+/-7.5 years) and group 2 (intra-articular reconstruction plus extra-articular quadircipital tendon plasty) included 29 patients (28.5+/-12 years). The IKDC score was determined for 72% of the knees in group 1 and 68% in group 2 at seven years follow-up on average (102 and 93 months respectively). Anterior laxity was measured radiographically and with KT-1000. The position of the tunnels was controlled using the Aglietti method. RESULTS: The subjective functional score was 83.6+/-3.5 in group 1 and 83.5+/-3.5 in group 2. The overall IKDC knee score classes for group 1 were 0% A, 52.4% B, 28.6% C, and 19% D and for group 2 were 5.5% group A, 50% group B, 33.3% group C, and 11.1% group D. In group 1, the pivot test was negative in 61.9% and noted stage 1 in 28.6% and stage 2 in 9.5%. In group 2, the pivot test was negative in 78.9% and noted stage 1 in 15.8% and stage 2 in 5.3%. The KT-1000 showed no difference in gain in laxity: 31% for group 1 and 27% for group 2. Similarly, radiographically there was no difference with a 43.9% gain in differential laxity for the medial compartment and 45.3% for the lateral compartment in group 1. In group 2 the corresponding values were 51.9% and 41.8%. The position of the tunnels was the same in the two groups. DISCUSSION: In a preliminary study with two years follow-up, the results in these two series were not significantly different. It was concluded that there was not clear advantage to adding the extra-articular lateral plasty. At the present 7-year follow-up, pivoting appears to be better controlled in the lateral plasty group (p=0.23), but with no significant difference for laxity for both knee compartments. The inclusion criteria would be different today and would be based on the laxity of the lateral compartment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]