These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Antitenascin antibody 81C6 armed with 177Lu: in vivo comparison of macrocyclic and acyclic ligands.
    Author: Yordanov AT, Hens M, Pegram C, Bigner DD, Zalutsky MR.
    Journal: Nucl Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 34(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 17307125.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: When labeled with iodine-131, the antitenascin monoclonal antibody (mAb) 81C6 has shown promise as a targeted radiotherapeutic in patients with brain tumors. Because of its more favorable gamma-ray properties, lutetium-177 might be a better low-energy beta-emitter for this type of therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chimeric 81C6 (ch81C6) was labeled with (177)Lu using the acyclic 1B4M ligand and the macrocyclic ligands NHS-DOTA and MeO-DOTA and evaluated for binding to tenascin. Three paired-label tissue distribution experiments were performed in normal mice receiving one of the (177)Lu-labeled immunoconjugates plus (125)I-labeled ch81C6 labeled using Iodogen. Paired-label experiments in athymic mice bearing subcutaneous D54 MG human glioma xenografts were done to directly compare the biodistribution of ch81C6-1B4M-(177)Lu and (125)I-labeled ch81C6, and ch81C6-MeO-DOTA-(177)Lu and (125)I-labeled ch81C6. Similar comparisons were done using murine (mu) instead of ch81C6. The primary parameter utilized for evaluation was the (177)Lu/(125)I uptake ratio in each tissue. RESULTS: In the studies performed in normal mice, the NHS-DOTA ligand yielded the highest (177)Lu/(125)I uptake ratios in tissues indicative of loss of label from the chelate; for this reason, only 1B4M and MeO-DOTA were evaluated further. The (177)Lu/(125)I ratio in bone increased gradually with time for the chimeric conjugates; however, there were no significant differences between ch81C6-1B4M-DTPA-(177)Lu and ch81C6-MeO-DOTA-(177)Lu. In contrast, mu81C6-1B4M-DTPA-(177)Lu and mu81C6-MeO-DOTA-(177)Lu showed a more dramatic increase in the (177)Lu/(125)I ratio in bone - from 2.4+/-0.3 and 1.7+/-0.2 at Day 1 to 8.5+/-1.1 and 4.2+/-0.5 at Day 7, respectively. CONCLUSION: With these antitenascin constructs, the nature of the mAb had a profound influence on the relative degree of loss of (177)Lu from these immunoconjugates. MeO-DOTA shows promise as a bifunctional chelate for labeling 81C6 mAbs with (177)Lu.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]