These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for detecting extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among chromosomal AmpC-producing Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, and Serratia marcescens.
    Author: Park YJ, Yu JK, Lee S, Park JJ, Oh EJ.
    Journal: Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2007; 37(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 17311873.
    Abstract:
    We evaluated the BD Phoenix Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase (ESBL) detection test among chromosomal AmpC-producing Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, and Serratia marcescens. The study was conducted on 72 non-repetitive ESBL producers (33 E. cloacae, 13 E. aerogenes, 14 C. freundii, and 12 S. marcescens) and 77 ESBL non-producers (33 E. cloacae, 9 E. aerogenes, 6 C. freundii, and 29 S. marcescens). The organisms were selected as suspected ESBL-producers based on the double disk synergy test and confirmed by PCR amplification of blaTEM-1, blaSHV-1, blaCTX-M-1, blaCTX-M-2, and blaCTX-M-9. The Phoenix ESBL test, using a 5-well confirmatory test and the BDXpert system, was evaluated. Of the 72 isolates identified as ESBL-producers based on the DDST, 46 isolates harbored CTX-M-type enzymes, 21 harbored TEM type enzymes, and 31 harbored SHV enzymes. The Phoenix system identified ESBL only in 15 isolates. Of the 77 ESBL non-producers, ths Phoenix system identified ESBL in 4 isolates, 3 of which were confirmed to be ESBL-producers. In this study, the Phoenix system was highly specific (76/77, 98.7%), and it identified 3 additional ESBL-producers that were not detected by DDST. However, the Phoenix system's sensitivity was very low (15/72, 20.8%). Considering the increasing prevalence of ESBL production among AmpC-producers, the BD Phoenix system could not be considered a reliable stand-alone ESBL detection method for the strains tested in our study.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]