These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Competing electron-transfer pathways in hydrocarbon frameworks: short-circuiting through-bond coupling by nonbonded contacts in rigid U-shaped norbornylogous systems containing a cavity-bound aromatic pendant group.
    Author: Chakrabarti S, Liu M, Waldeck DH, Oliver AM, Paddon-Row MN.
    Journal: J Am Chem Soc; 2007 Mar 21; 129(11):3247-56. PubMed ID: 17315995.
    Abstract:
    This work explores electron transfer through nonbonded contacts in two U-shaped DBA molecules 1DBA and 2DBA by measuring electron-transfer rates in organic solvents of different polarities. These molecules have identical U-shaped norbornylogous frameworks, 12 bonds in length and with diphenyldimethoxynaphthalene (DPMN) donor and dicyanovinyl (DCV) acceptor groups fused at the ends. The U-shaped cavity of each molecule contains an aromatic pendant group of different electronic character, namely p-ethylphenyl, in 1DBA, and p-methoxyphenyl, in 2DBA. Electronic coupling matrix elements, Gibbs free energy, and reorganization energy were calculated from experimental photophysical data for these compounds, and the experimental results were compared with computational values. The magnitude of the electronic coupling for photoinduced charge separation, /V(CS)/, in 1DBA and 2DBA were found to be 147 and 274 cm(-1), respectively, and suggests that the origin of this difference lies in the electronic nature of the pendant aromatic group and charge separation occurs by tunneling through the pendant group, rather than through the bridge. 2DBA, but not 1DBA, displayed charge transfer (CT) fluorescence in nonpolar and weakly polar solvents, and this observation enabled the electronic coupling for charge recombination, /V(CR)/, in 2DBA to be made, the magnitude of which is approximately 500 cm(-1), significantly larger than that for charge separation. This difference is explained by changes in the geometry of the molecule in the relevant states; because of electrostatic effects, the donor and acceptor chromophores are about 1 A closer to the pendant group in the charge-separated state than in the locally excited state. Consequently the through-pendant-group electronic coupling is stronger in the charge-separated state--which controls the CT fluorescence process--than in the locally excited state--which controls the charge separation process. The magnitude of /V(CR)/ for 2DBA is almost 2 orders of magnitude greater than that in DMN-12-DCV, having the same length bridge as for the former molecule, but lacking a pendant group. This result unequivocally demonstrates the operation of the through-pendant-group mechanism of electron transfer in the pendant-containing U-shaped systems of the type 1DBA and 2DBA.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]