These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Using web-based screening to enhance efficiency of HMO clinical trial recruitment in women aged forty and older.
    Author: Smith KS, Eubanks D, Petrik A, Stevens VJ.
    Journal: Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 17327250.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Screening potential participants for clinical trials can be labor-intensive, particularly when using long questionnaires administered by telephone. PURPOSE: This report describes the development and use of an interactive recruitment website as a supplemental screening strategy for a study using telephone screening interviews. METHODS: Female HMO members, aged 40 and older, were recruited for a study testing dietary change interventions. Cohorts of potential participants were identified from electronic membership records every two to four weeks; they were sent a letter describing the study and then contacted by telephone. Those interested in the study were asked to complete a 27-question screening interview focused on dietary habits. After 14 cohorts of women were recruited by this method (n=4246), a recruitment website was added and an additional 12 cohorts (n=3000) were contacted. The modified recruitment letter for these later screening cohorts included the website address and a personal password for each woman. The website contained study information, and those who were interested could complete eligibility screening on-line. RESULTS: Proactive participant response (women actively seeking study participation/screening) to the recruitment mailing was 9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.6-10.4%) in the cohorts without the website option and 11.5% (CI, 10.4-12.7%) after addition of the website option (P=0.004). About half of women screened were ineligible for the study, a proportion that did not statistically differ by recruitment method. LIMITATIONS: The study population was limited to middle-aged and older female members of a non-profit health plan, so the generalizability of these findings to other populations is unknown. The pre-post design used in this study does not control for possible temporal changes unrelated to the study methods. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of the website screening option was associated with a relative 22% increase in recruitment combined with reduced staff time required for screening, thereby increasing screening efficiency. Web-based options for clinical trial recruitment and screening in targeted populations may increase response rates while also reducing staff time.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]