These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A clinical trial of fiberoptic phototherapy vs conventional phototherapy.
    Author: Holtrop PC, Madison K, Maisels MJ.
    Journal: Am J Dis Child; 1992 Feb; 146(2):235-7. PubMed ID: 1733156.
    Abstract:
    We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to compare fiberoptic phototherapy with conventional phototherapy in healthy jaundiced newborns with birth weights greater than 2500 g. Twelve patients received fiberoptic phototherapy and 14 patients received conventional phototherapy. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to birth weight, gestational age, feeding method, presence of hemolytic disease, hematocrit, reticulocyte count, or initial serum bilirubin level. Measured irradiance at 425 to 475 nm for conventional phototherapy was greater than that of fiberoptic phototherapy (9.2 +/- 0.9 microW/cm2 per nanometer vs 8.2 +/- 1.2 microW/cm2 per nanometer). Both types of phototherapy lowered the level of serum bilirubin after 18 hours of therapy (fiberoptic group, from 231 +/- 29 to 210 +/- 24 mumol/L; conventional group, from 231 +/- 21 to 188 +/- 26 mumol/L), but the mean serum bilirubin level was lower after 18 hours of therapy in the conventional phototherapy group (188 +/- 26 vs 210 +/- 24 mumol/L). There were no side effects in either group of newborns. Both methods of phototherapy decreased the serum bilirubin level, but conventional phototherapy did so more effectively, probably because of its greater irradiance.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]