These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Outcomes of wavefront-optimized surface ablation.
    Author: Randleman JB, Loft ES, Banning CS, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD.
    Journal: Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):983-8. PubMed ID: 17337064.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare early visual outcomes after wavefront-optimized advanced surface ablation (ASA) with those after wavefront-optimized LASIK. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-six eyes undergoing ASA and 136 preoperative refraction-matched eyes undergoing LASIK from June 2004 through October 2005. METHODS: Database review of preoperative characteristics, including patient age, gender, refraction, and central corneal pachymetry; perioperative information, including type of surgery, flap thickness (for LASIK cases), ablation depth, and residual stromal bed thickness; and postoperative information, including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 3 months, refraction at 3 months, and complications. All ASA patients had topical mitomycin C applied intraoperatively. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Postoperative UCVA, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), spherical equivalent (SE) refraction, speed of visual recovery, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Surface ablation patients were younger (35.4 years vs. 39.8 years, P = 0.0002) and had thinner corneas (514 microm vs. 549 microm, P<0.0001) preoperatively. Average UCVA was significantly better after LASIK at 1 day (20/26.8 vs. 20/50.4, P<0.0001) and 2 weeks (20/24.4 vs. 20/33.3, P = 0.0002) postoperatively. However, by 3 months postoperatively, UCVA was better after ASA (20/20.8 vs. 20/22.7, P = 0.05), and 81.5% of patients achieved 20/20 or better UCVA after ASA, compared with 70.5% after LASIK (P = 0.05). More ASA eyes had postoperative UCVA that achieved or surpassed preoperative BSCVA than LASIK eyes (66% vs. 41.6%, P<0.0001). There were 53 patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous ASA. By 1 week, 87.5% had 20/40 or better UCVA in at least one eye and 62.5% had 20/40 or better UCVA in both eyes. By 2 weeks, 86.8% had 20/40 or better UCVA in one eye and 82.6% had 20/40 or better UCVA in both eyes. CONCLUSION: Initial visual recovery is more rapid after LASIK; however, by 3 months postoperatively UCVA and SE refractions were better after ASA. Advanced surface ablation is an effective alternative to LASIK, and based on early visual recovery, bilateral simultaneous surface ablation is a reasonable alternative to sequential surgery for the majority of patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]