These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A percutaneous catheter-based system for the measurement of potential gradients applicable to the study of transthoracic defibrillation.
    Author: Rosborough JP, Deno DC, Walker RG, Niemann JT.
    Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 17338711.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The local electric (E) field or potential gradient produced by a shock reliably predicts VF termination. In this study we evaluated a multiple electrode, catheter-based device for closed-chest 3D measurements of E field from transthoracic defibrillation shocks. METHODS: Catheters with multiple electrodes on the tip were placed in intracardiac locations in anesthetized swine. An empirically derived calibration matrix and custom microprocessor was used to transform simultaneously measured voltages into orthogonal E field vector components. E fields produced in six intracardiac locations by 30 and 300 J shocks were compared in eight animals. Correlations were determined for measured current and E field at various shock strengths at two different transthoracic impedances in five additional animals. VF was induced in 12 animals and E field measured during defibrillation attempts. RESULTS: The E field measurements resulting for 30 J transthoracic shocks were not significantly different among different intracardiac sites. At 300 J, however, significant differences were observed between sites with the greatest intensities recorded in the coronary sinus and right ventricle. Within animals, the variability of the measurement at each site was small, ranging from 2.8 +/- 1.6% to 5.7 +/- 4.5%. Significant correlations (P < 0.001) between measured E field and peak current were observed at native impedance (34 +/- 4 Omega, r = 0.81) and at adjusted impedance (76 +/- 4 Omega, r = 0.78) with transthoracic shocks of 200, 300, and 360 J. In VF studies, the probability of defibrillation was closely fit by a sigmoidal dose response curve in the coronary sinus E field with an approximate threshold of 4.7 V/cm with 50% defibrillation success at 9.3 V/cm. CONCLUSIONS: The measured intracardiac E field variability within animals and at a specific site was small, exhibiting a median value of 5.1%, contrasted to median variabilities across animals of 5-11% suggesting the capacity of this measurement system to provide subject specific information on the distribution of E fields. The measured E field magnitudes across animals in the coronary sinus were linearly correlated with applied shock current with a very strong linear relation to effective shock voltage observed in vitro in a saline tank. When evaluated as a predictor of shock success, the observed values were consistent with previously reported critical fields. This technique may be of value in evaluating waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation as well as electrode size, placement, and composition.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]