These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses.
    Author: Guiraud J, Gallego S, Arnold L, Boyle P, Truy E, Collet L.
    Journal: Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):44-57. PubMed ID: 17350776.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this study was to distinguish the effects of different parameters on latencies of wave N1, wave P2, and inter-peak interval N1-P2 of electrical late auditory responses (ELARs). ELARs were recorded from four intra-cochlear electrodes in fourteen adult HiRes90K cochlear implant users who had at least three months of experience. The relationship between latencies and stimulation sites in the cochlea was characterized to assess the influence of the auditory pathway anatomy on ELARs, i.e., whether the speed of neural propagation varies according to the place that is activated in the cochlea. Audiograms before implantation, duration of deafness, and psychophysics at first fitting were used to describe the influence of deafness characteristics on latencies. The stimulation sites were found to have no effect on ELAR latency and, while there was no influence of psychophysics on latency, a strong relationship was shown with duration of deafness and the pre-implantation audiogram. Thus, ELAR latency was longer for poorer audiograms and longer durations of deafness and this relationship appeared to be independent of stimulation parameters such as stimulation site. Comparison between these findings and those from the equivalent study on EABR waves IIIe and Ve latency [Guiraud, J., Gallego, S., Arnold, L., Boyle, P., Truy, E., Collet, L., 2007. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses. Hear. Res. 223 (1-2), 48-60] shows that, while ELAR and EABR latencies are related with parameters that reflect the integrity of the auditory pathway, ELAR latency is less dependent on stimulation parameters than EABR latency.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]