These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Esophageal replacement. 12 years experience].
    Author: Avila LF, Luis AL, Encinas JL, Andrés AM, Suárez O, Martínez L, Fernández A, Queizán A, Murcia J, Olivares P, Lassaletta L, Tovar JA.
    Journal: Cir Pediatr; 2006 Oct; 19(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 17352110.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: Esophageal replacement is a surgical procedure rarely indicated in children. It is used in esophageal atresia type I and long-gap atresia when anastomosis is not possible, corrosive strictures and other unusual causes. Type and location of the graft depend on etiology and surgeon preferences. We analyse our results of a large series of esophageal replacement. METHODS: . We reviewed esophageal replacements carried out in our department between January-1992 and December-2004. We report 29 patients (15 girls and 14 boys) with ages ranging from 2 months until 14 years old (median 24 months). 11 (37.9%) had esophageal atresia type I, 7 (24.1%) long-gap esophageal atresia, 8 (27.5%) caustic esophagitis, 1 herpetic esophagitis, 1 candida esophagitis and 1 esophageal necrosis due to sclerotherapy. Colon was used for substitution in 25 cases (86.2%) and stomach in 4 (13.8%). Graft location was retromediastinal in 25 children (86.2%), retrosternal in 3 and subcutaneous in 1. Native esophagus was removed in all but 2 out of 3 retrosternal cases. RESULTS: After a follow up between 7 and 145 months (median 76 months) all children have a functional graft. Actually all patients tolerate oral feeding in a satisfactory way, and have had a normal pondostatural growth. Post-operative complications were pyloric obstruction in 3 patients (10.3%), upper anastomosis stricture in 3 (10.3%), 2 (6.9%) surgical wound evisceration, 2 (6.9%) diaphragmatic hernia, 1 (3.4%) retro-mediastinal abscess and 1 (3.4%) colo-gastric emptying difficulties. Also 2 pleural effusions, 1 cervical wound abscess and 1 abdominal wound one. Re-operation was needed in 11 patients (38%) due to these adverse events. Other complications were conservatively solved: 6 (20.7%) salivary fistula, 1 intestinal suboclusion and a dumping syndrome. One girl died due to a mycotic mediastinal abscess with perforation of the aorta 11 days after surgery. Overall survival was 96.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal replacement has limited indications. It allow a good functional result, with adequate oral feeding and normal growth. We believe that both colon and stomach have similar outcomes, but gastric pull-up is easier to perform. It is a major surgery whose risk of complications is higher in early post-operative time.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]