These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Mid-term results of endovascular reconstruction for aorto-iliac obstructive disease. Author: Piffaretti G, Tozzi M, Lomazzi C, Rivolta N, Laganà D, Carrafiello G, Caronno R, Castelli P. Journal: Int Angiol; 2007 Mar; 26(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 17353884. Abstract: AIM: Aorto-iliac obstructive disease has been traditionally treated with endarterectomy and/or a surgical bypass graft. Kissing-stents technique has been proposed to reconstruct the aorto-iliac bifurcation for complex aorto-iliac lesions. METHODS: We report 43 patients with complex aorto-iliac occlusions managed with endovascular repair. Between March 1999 and October 2005, a total of 43 patients with a mean age of 66+/-10 years underwent endovascular treatment for aorto-iliac obstructive disease. Lesions were classified C (n=34) and D (n=9), accordingly to the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) classification. All endovascular interventions were performed in the theatre under regional anesthesia. Predilation with kissing-balloons angioplasty was usually performed; the bifurcation was then eventually reconstructed using bilateral stents placed with the kissing technique. Clinical examination and duplex scans or computed tomography-angiography (CT-A) were performed at discharge and 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure, with yearly studies thereafter. RESULTS: Kissing-stents technique was selectively used in 30 cases (69.7%); the remainder cases were treated with kissing-balloons. Major complications occurred in 2 patients (4.6%). Overall, mean hospitalization was 4.1+/-2.8 days (median 3 days). Mean follow-up was 32.4 months (range 1-84 months; median 36 months). During the follow-up, 2 patients (4.6%) died. Duplex and/or CT-A examination detected 4 re-occlusions. Primary patency rates at 12, 24, and 60 months were 92%, 85.7%, and 80.7%, respectively; overall secondary patency rate was 40/43 patients. CONCLUSIONS: We consider this approach most appropriate for patients deemed at high operative risk for conventional repair or for those who refuse surgery.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]