These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein is more sensitive than troponin T to detect the ongoing myocardial damage in chronic heart failure patients.
    Author: Niizeki T, Takeishi Y, Arimoto T, Takabatake N, Nozaki N, Hirono O, Watanabe T, Nitobe J, Harada M, Suzuki S, Koyama Y, Kitahara T, Sasaki T, Kubota I.
    Journal: J Card Fail; 2007 Mar; 13(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 17395052.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) is a small cytosolic protein and released into the circulation when the myocardium is injured. Previous studies have demonstrated that both H-FABP and troponin T (TnT) are detectable in venous blood samples in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients, suggesting the presence of ongoing myocardial damage (OMD). We hypothesized that a cytosolic marker (H-FABP) is more sensitive than a myofibrillar component (TnT) in the detection of OMD in CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured serum H-FABP and TnT levels in 126 consecutive CHF patients at admission, and patients were followed-up with a mean period of 474 +/- 328 days. Cutoff values for H-FABP (4.3 ng/mL) and TnT (0.01 ng/mL) were determined from previous studies. Positive rate of H-FABP was higher than that of TnT in all CHF patients (46% [58/126] versus 26% [33/126], P < .0001), and in severe CHF (New York Heart Association III/IV) patients (69% [34/49] versus 47% [23/49], P = .0121). There were 27 cardiac events during a follow-up period. In patients with cardiac events, H-FABP was more frequently detected than TnT (88% [24/27] versus 44% [12/27], P = .0103). There were 33 patients with positive H-FABP among 93 patients with negative TnT. Those patients had more severe New York Heart Association class, higher levels of brain natriuretic peptide, and higher rates of cardiac events (36% versus 5%, P < .0001) compared with those both H-FABP and TnT were negative. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that in patients with negative TnT, positive H-FABP group had higher risk for cardiac events than negative H-FABP group (P < .0001). A multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard model showed that H-FABP was the only independent predictor of cardiac events (hazard ratio 15.677, P = .0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was larger for H-FABP than for TnT (0.779 versus 0.581; P = .009), suggesting that H-FABP had greater predictive capacity for cardiac events than TnT. CONCLUSIONS: H-FABP was more sensitive to detect OMD and could identify patients at high risk more effectively than TnT.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]