These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Quantification of pulsatility as a function of vascular input impedance: an in vitro study.
    Author: Kaebnick BW, Giridharan GA, Koenig SC.
    Journal: ASAIO J; 2007; 53(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17413547.
    Abstract:
    The physiological benefits of pulsatility generated by ventricular assist device (VAD) support continue to be heavily debated as application of VAD support has been expanded to include destination and recovery therapies. In this study, the relationship between input impedance (Zart) and vascular pulsatility during continuous flow (CF) or pulsatile flow (PF) VAD support was investigated. Hemodynamic waveforms were recorded at baseline failure and with 50%, 75%, and 100% CF or PF VAD support for nine different Zart test conditions (combination of three different resistance and compliance settings) in a mock circulatory system simulating left ventricular failure. High-fidelity hemodynamic pressure and flow waveforms were recorded to calculate mean arterial pressure (MAP), Zart, energy equivalent pressure (EEP), and surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE) as metrics for quantifying vascular pulsatility. MAP and EEP were elevated with increasing resistance whereas SHE was reduced with increasing compliance. Vascular pulsatility was restored with increasing PF VAD support, but diminished by up to 90% with increasing CF VAD support. The nonpulsatile energy component (MAP) of the pressure waveform is dependent on resistance whereas the pulsatile energy component (SHE) is dependent on compliance. The impact of Zart and vascular pulsatility on patient recovery with VAD support warrants further investigation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]