These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Analyses of anti-hCV detected by ELISA and HCV RNA detected by RT-nPCR in chronic hepatitis C virus infectors].
    Author: Gao Q, Liu D, Zhang S, Tong L.
    Journal: Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2007 Jan; 36(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 17424854.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: In order to provide the basis for the clinical test and the blood station screening the health donator, the results of anti-HCV tested by ELISA (enzyme-linked-immuno-absorbed assay ) and HCV RNA tested by RT-nPCR (reverse-transcript-nested-polymerase-chain-reaction) were compared in the chronic hepatitis C virus infectors. METHODS: Venous blood samples of 133 chronic hepatitis C virus infectors, 52 health controls were collected in May 2005. These infectors were infected with HCV nearly in 1990 through plasma donator and diagnosed in 1993 in a rural area of Zhao County in Hebei Province, which remained the same diagnosis as HCV infectors in 2002 Hebei Province. The anti-HCV was tested by ELISA and HCV RNA was tested by RT-nPCR. RESULTS: (1) In 185 cases, the positive rates of both anti-HCV and HCV RNA were 49.73% (92/185). The rate of anti-HCV negative but HCV RNA positive was 9.73% (18/185). The rate of anti-HCV positive but HCV RNA negative was 11.89% (22/185). The negative rate of both anti-HCV and HCV RNA tested was 28.65% (53/185). The result-agreement rate of ELISA and RT-nPCR methods were 78.38% [(92 + 53)/185]. The disagreement rate between ELISA and RT-nPCR methods was not obviously different (paired chi2 = 0.40, P > 0.05). (2) In the chronic HCV infectors, the sensitivity of anti-HCV tested by ELISA was 82.71%, the specificity was 92.31%, and the omitting rate was 17.29%. The sensitivity of HCV RNA tested by RT-nPCR was 81.20%, the specificity was 96.15%, and the omitting rate was 18.80%. The sensitivity between ELISA and RT-nPCR was not obviously different (chi2 = 0.102, P > 0.05). (3) The sensitivity tested by ELISA combined with RT-nPCR was 96.75%, which was evidently higher than that of single ELISA (82.71%) (chi2 = 9.62, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The false negative rate was nearly 17% when anti-HCV was tested with single ELISA in HCV infectors. The positive testing rate of HCV infection was increased remarkably when ELISA and RT-nPCR were tested simultaneously.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]