These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Effect of an alcohol-free, 1% chlorhexidine gel as an adjunct to a fluoridated dentifrice using an intraoral crown model.
    Author: Timmons SR, Harless JD, Hogan MM, Eckert GJ, Marek CL, Drake DR, Wefel JS.
    Journal: Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):190-7. PubMed ID: 17426398.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of chlorhexidine as a topically applied oral antiseptic is well documented; however, clinical studies examining the effects of chlorhexidine gel on in situ dental caries are limited. This study utilized an in situ caries model and a modified crossover design to examine whether the addition of a biweekly topical, alcohol-free, 1% chlorhexidine digluconate gel to a daily fluoridated dentifrice inhibited artificial caries in dental tissues better than the fluoridated dentifrice alone when compared to a nonfluoridated placebo dentifrice. METHODS: Thirty patients were recruited based on their need for a mandibular, full crown. Artificial caries lesions were created in extracted human teeth and enamel and root tissue sections 100 mum in thickness were characterized using polarized light microscopy. The sections were fixed in the crown and placed on the prepared tooth. The participants were assigned a placebo toothpaste, a toothpaste with 1,100 ppm F or a 1,100 ppm F toothpaste followed by 1 ml of 1% chlorhexidine gel at day 1 and day 14 (chlorhexidine+). Patients were instructed to brush twice daily for 4 weeks. Following each round, the sections in the crown were replaced with new sections. The sections were recharacterized and the mean changes were compared using ANOVA at alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: The chlorhexidine + Fdentifrice and the F dentifrice alone significantly reduced lesion area in enamel tissue when compared to the placebo dentifrice. Both treatments also inhibited lesion progression and initiation in root tissue better than control in this model system. Although the chlorhexidine+ group enhanced remineralization and inhibited lesion progression better than the F(-) dentifrice alone for all outcomes measured, the differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The chlorhexidine, in conjunction with a fluoride dentifrice, was no more effective than the fluoride dentifrice alone. Further study is needed before this 1% alcohol-free chlorhexidine gel should be recommended as an adjunct to a fluoride dentifrice in the treatment of dental caries.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]