These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Coordination between postural and movement controls: effect of changes in body mass distribution on postural and focal component characteristics.
    Author: Robert G, Blouin J, Ruget H, Mouchnino L.
    Journal: Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 181(1):159-71. PubMed ID: 17431599.
    Abstract:
    Whole-body reaching movements are accomplished through a combination of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) and focal movements. Two different modes of central organization is usually proposed for this coordination: first, a single-process control, where the APAs and the focal movements would share a common command; second, where the APAs and the focal movements would be independently controlled through parallel commands (dual-process control). Here, we investigated which one of these modes of control could better explain the coordination between the trunk and the upper limb for standing subjects reaching for a target located beyond arm's length. This was done evaluating the effect of changing the APAs settings on the arm movement. The APAs modification was achieved by shifting the subject's centre of mass prior to the focal movement onset; this was done by adding an asymmetric load on either side of the head (a control condition with the load fixed centrally at the top of the head was also performed). As it changed the body mass distribution, the muscular torques and the orientation of the head inertia tensor, it is assumed that the addition of the asymmetric load led to a change in the APAs. Analyses indeed showed that both the initial head and trunk displacement towards the supporting side (during the unloading of the moving leg) were smaller when the load was fixed on the side of the supporting leg than when it was fixed on the side of the moving leg. However, changing the initial conditions, and therefore the APAs settings, had no significant effect on the path and kinematics of the focal hand movement. Therefore, subjects cancelled out the effect of the trunk motion on the hand-in-space motion through compensatory arm movements. These results support the dual-process control hypothesis for the postural and the focal components.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]