These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical outcome after D1 vs D2-3 gastrectomy for treatment of gastric cancer.
    Author: Danielson H, Kokkola A, Kiviluoto T, Sirén J, Louhimo J, Kivilaakso E, Puolakkainen P.
    Journal: Scand J Surg; 2007; 96(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17461310.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Clinical benefit from extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer remains controversial as a considerable variation exists between results of different studies. METHODS: 562 patients were treated at HUCH between 1987-2003, whereof 223 underwent gastrectomy with curative intent. Of these, 114 patients underwent subtotal/total gastrectomy with D1 (standard) lymphadenectomy and 109 patients had D2-3 (extended) lymph node dissection. The clinical outcome of these patients was analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: The incidence of surgical complications was 33.0% in D2-3 and 16.8% in D1 lymphadenectomy groups (p = 0.008). Abscess was the most common complication (11.0%) among D2-3 operated patients and haemorrhage (4.4%) in D1 group. Hospital mortality was 3.7% in D2-3 and 1.8% in D1 group (p = 0.438). The only statistically significant factor influencing the rate of complications was D2-3 lymphadenectomy (OR 2.620, 95% C.I. 1.375 to 4.991). D2-3 was associated with a longer postoperative hospital stay and operation time, greater blood loss and increased need for blood transfusions compared to D1. The 5-year survival was not statistically different between lymphadenectomy groups. CONCLUSION: It is justified to perform a D2-3 gastrectomy in Europe with a acceptable postoperative mortality but with a significant morbidity. Further studies are needed to assess the value of extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]