These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: End-of-life patients, intensive care and consent: difficulties facing French intensivists.
    Author: Franchitto N, Vinour H, Gavarri L, Telmon N, Rouge D.
    Journal: Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Aug; 24(8):709-13. PubMed ID: 17462114.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The French legislature passed a law in 2005 that assigns a new role to the physician and redefines his liability in end-of-life decisions. METHOD: This law is presented and discussed in context with current French legal practice. RESULTS: This law emphasizes patient autonomy, advocating that the patient be fully informed before treatment, and creates specific procedures to be followed according to whether the patient is conscious or unconscious. In the latter situation, the law reinforces the role of both the patient's surrogate and the patient's advance directives in establishing consent. In these extreme situations, doctors have the option to request a second medical opinion. This joint decision-making procedure is laid down by law and becomes obligatory in the interests of transparency. CONCLUSION: Respect for patients' consent implies the possibility that they may refuse medical care, creating an ethical and legal dilemma of providing medical care or respecting the patients' wishes. The key issue concerning end-of-life patients rests in the decisions taken concerning the continuation or withdrawal of life support and the administration of palliative care.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]