MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit.
Author: Novitsky YW, Harrell AG, Cristiano JA, Paton BL, Norton HJ, Peindl RD, Kercher KW, Heniford BT.
Journal: J Surg Res; 2007 Jun 01; 140(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17481980.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Effective laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy usually mandates the use of an intraperitoneal prosthetic. Visceral adhesions and changes in textile characteristics of prosthetics may complicate repairs, especially long-term. The aim of this study was to compare the adhesion formation, tissue ingrowth, and textile characteristics one year after intra-abdominal placement of the commonly used prosthetic meshes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty (4 x 4 cm) meshes were sutured using absorbable suture to an intact peritoneum in 20 New Zealand white rabbits. The study groups included: polypropylene (PP) [Marlex; C.R. Bard Inc, Cranston, NJ], expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) [DualMesh; WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ], ePTFE and PP (ePTFE/PP) [Composix, C.R. Bard Inc], reduced weight PP and oxidized regenerated cellulose (rPP/C) [Proceed; Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ]. The meshes were explanted after one year. Adhesions were scored as a percentage of explanted biomaterials' affected surface area. Prosthetic shrinkage was calculated. The strength of incorporation and mesh compliance were evaluated using differential variable reluctance transducers. Mesh ingrowth was measured as the load necessary to distract the mesh/tissue complex. Mesh compliance was calculated as the change in linear displacement of the sensors due to applied load. The groups were compared using Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: ePTFE had significantly less adhesions (0%) than both ePTFE/PP (40%) and PP (80%) groups (P < 0.001). The mean area of adhesions for the rPP/C (10%) and the ePTFE/PP (14%) groups was less than that for the PP group (40%) (P = 0.02). Prosthetic shrinkage was greatest in the ePTFE (32%) group than in any other group (P = 0.001). There were no differences in mesh incorporation between the groups. At explantation, mesh compliance in the ePTFE group was superior to other meshes (P < 0.0001). The rPP/C mesh induced the smallest change in the compliance of the tissue adjacent to the mesh (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic materials demonstrate a wide variety of characteristics. Although exposed PP formed the most adhesions, up to 40% of the other PP-based meshes formed adhesions despite protective barriers. The ePTFE mesh did not induce adhesions and was the most compliant, however, this prosthetic's contraction was greatest. Reduced weight polypropylene (rPP/C) mesh induced the smallest change in the adjacent tissue pliability/compliance. Understanding of the long-term effects of various prosthetic materials is important to ensure an adequate hernia repair while minimizing postoperative morbidity and patient discomfort.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]