These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses of giant cell glioblastoma multiforme reveal distinct profiles in giant cell and non-giant cell subpopulations. Author: Martinez R, Roggendorf W, Baretton G, Klein R, Toedt G, Lichter P, Schackert G, Joos S. Journal: Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2007 May; 175(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17498554. Abstract: We have comparatively analyzed mechanisms associated with chromosomal and microsatellite instability in giant cell glioblastoma multiforme (gcGBM) and classic GBM. This included microsatellite instability (MSI), loss of expression of four major mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, aberrations of five chromosomes, EGFR copy number, and TP53 mutations. MSI was more frequent among gcGBM (30 vs. 7.8%, P = 0.054). TP53 mutations were more commonly observed in gcGBM (83.3%), whereas EGFR was amplified in just one gcGBM (8.3%). By tumor cell phenotype-specific cytogenetic analysis of gcGBM, increased chromosome copy numbers were identified in 72-84% of giant cells but in only 4-14% of nongiant cells; in classic GBM, intermediate frequencies were noted (11-49%). Chromosome 10 deletions were found in nongiant cells of all gcGBM cases but in only approximately 45% of the cell population in classic GBM. The present study shows a distinct pattern of cytogenetic alterations in nongiant and giant cell phenotypes in gcGBM and suggests that multinuclear giant cells evolve from nongiant tumor cells at an early tumor stage. Furthermore, the data point to differences in the profile of chromosomal and microsatellite instability in gcGBM and classic GBM that might underscore the distinct pathological features of both tumor subtypes.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]