These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of the extent of delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with and without phase-sensitive reconstruction at 3.0 T.
    Author: Cochet A, Lalande A, Walker PM, Boichot C, Ciappuccini R, Cottin Y, Wolf JE, Brunotte F.
    Journal: Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):372-6. PubMed ID: 17507807.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate phase-sensitive reconstructed images versus magnitude images generated by an inversion recovery pulse sequence for the determination of myocardial infarct size in delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) at 3 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were examined at 3 T and DE images were obtained 10 minutes after contrast agent administration using a phase-sensitive breath-hold segmented inversion recovery gradient echo sequence. From magnitude and phase images, the percentage of hyperenhanced myocardium was expressed. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements were performed in hyperenhanced and normal myocardium. RESULTS: We observed excellent correlation and concordance between hyperenhanced myocardium determined on phase-sensitive reconstructed and magnitude images. The mean CNR values were significantly higher in phase-sensitive reconstructed images compared with magnitude images (10.5 +/- 5.4 vs. 6.1 +/- 4.8; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DE-CMR with phase-sensitive reconstruction at 3.0 T provides similar results to magnitude images, but with a significantly greater CNR between infarcted and normal myocardium.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]