These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Different lipolytic effects of theophylline and dibutyryl cyclic AMP in vivo and in vitro.
    Author: Baum D, French JW.
    Journal: Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 1976 Feb; 151(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 175376.
    Abstract:
    Both dcAMP and theophylline are known to promote lipolysis in vitro by increasing intracellular cAMP. Although theophylline stimulates FFA mobilization in vivo as well, a report of low circulating FFA levels in the rat given dcAMP suggested that dcAMP may inhibit lipolysis in the intact animal. To explore this possibility, a comparison of the in vitro and in vivo lipolytic effects of theophylline and dcAMP was made in the young dog. Circulating glycerol and FFA levels rose following the administration of theophylline. While glycerol and FFA fell slightly in puppies given dcAMP, only the FFA change was significant. Epinephrine infusions given alone produced sustained elevations of glycerol and FFA. When theophylline was given in conjunction with ongoing epinephrine infusions, plasma glycerol and FFA levels remained high. On the other hand, epinephrine-stimulated lipolysis was markedly inhibited by dcAMP, as shown by pronounced falls of glycerol and FFA from the elevated levels found with epinephrine alone. In vitro studies involving fragments of puppy adipose tissue reveal that epinephrine, theophylline, and dcAMP promoted glycerol release. In contrast to the in vivo observations, lipolysis was also stimulated by combinations of both epinephrine and theophylline as well as by epinephrine and dcAMP. Thus, theophylline stimulates lipolysis in vitro and in vivo in the puppy. In contrast, dcAMP stimulates lipolysis in vitro but inhibits this action in the intact animal. This important difference in the two pharmacologic agents suggests the need for caution when using them in in vivo studies involving the action of cAMP.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]