These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Pregnancy after Essure placement: report of two cases. Author: Moses AW, Burgis JT, Bacon JL, Risinger J. Journal: Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):724.e9-11. PubMed ID: 17543963. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To report two cases of pregnancy after placement of Essure micro-inserts. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: University-based Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. PATIENT(S): Patient 1, a 38-year-old woman, presented with a positive pregnancy test 7 months after Essure hysteroscopic sterilization. Patient 2, a 35-year-old female, became pregnant approximately 1 year after undergoing the Essure procedure. INTERVENTION(S): Patient 1 received obstetric ultrasounds, a prophylactic cerclage, a cesarean section, and a tubal ligation. Patient 2 underwent a postprocedure hysterosalpingogram, an obstetric ultrasound, pregnancy termination, diagnostic pelvic ultrasound, and a hysterectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Documentation of normal progress of pregnancy after Essure placement. RESULT(S): Patient 1 carried an uncomplicated pregnancy to term with an Essure micro-insert in place. Patient 2 became pregnant despite an hysterosalpingogram showing tubal occlusion and was ultimately found to have a micro-insert perforating the uterine wall. CONCLUSION(S): The presence of Essure micro-inserts in the fallopian tubes do not appear to interfere with implantation and pregnancy. Uterine perforation by an Essure micro-insert in proximity to the tubal ostia may mimic proper micro-insert placement and bilateral tubal occlusion on both hysterosalpingogram and saline infusion sonography.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]