These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Influence of temporal insonation window quality on the assessment of cerebral autoregulation with transcranial Doppler sonography.
    Author: Lorenz MW, Gonzalez M, Lienerth C, Loesel N, Thoelen N, Sitzer M.
    Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1540-5. PubMed ID: 17544566.
    Abstract:
    Cerebral autoregulation can be assessed quickly and noninvasively using transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD). A poor transtemporal insonation window is a common limitation in TCD examinations. The effects of insonation quality on TCD autoregulation measurements have never been investigated. We developed two methods to quantitatively measure insonation quality. We also validated a model to artificially worsen the insonation window. This involves inserting a thin aluminium foil between the TCD probe and the skin. Forty-six healthy volunteers underwent TCD examination before and after artificial reduction of the transtemporal insonation quality. Two autoregulation parameters, the phase difference (PD) and a cross-correlation coefficient (Mx), were calculated from the recordings. The aluminium foil model realistically simulates poor insonation conditions, producing a decrease in the signal power from 36.4 +/- 2.8 dB to 32.0 +/- 1.5 dB. In corrupted insonation windows, the PD is artificially low (native: 34.2 +/- 9.3 degrees , corrupted: 29.9 +/- 9.7 degrees , p = 0.002), but the Mx is not significantly different. Insonation quality may introduce a systematic bias of clinically relevant magnitude into TCD-based cerebral autoregulation studies. This must be considered when studies of elderly patients are planned. This article discusses strategies to account for this bias.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]