These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Angiography and ultrasonography. A comparative study of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Author: Wheeler WE, Beachley MC, Ranniger K.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Jan; 126(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 175689.
    Abstract:
    Ultrasound is presently the diagnostic procedure of choice in pulsatile abdominal masses. The ease and accuracy of this method have many advantages over aortography, and ultrasonography can accurately define the size of an abdominal aortic aneruysm. In addition, a normal aorta with an overlying mass, or a tortuous aorta which feels unusually prominent, can be detected, and aortography may not be necessary. Although ultrasound can detect involvement of iliac arteries, it does not allow assessment of the position of the aneurysm relative to the renal arteries, or detect involvement of other branch vessels of the aorta. Ultrasound is more accurate that clinical examination, plain roentgenography, aortography, or isotope aortography in the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]