These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of new calcium channel blocker, azelnidipine, and amlodipine on baroreflex sensitivity and ambulatory blood pressure.
    Author: Eguchi K, Tomizawa H, Ishikawa J, Hoshide S, Fukuda T, Numao T, Shimada K, Kario K.
    Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2007 Jun; 49(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 17577104.
    Abstract:
    The effect of dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB) on baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is not well described. We studied the effect of a new CCB, azelnidipine, compared with amlodipine, on BRS and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in newly diagnosed untreated hypertension. This study was a prospective, randomized, and open-label study. We randomized patients to either azelnidipine or amlodipine treatment. Azelnidipine 8 to 16 mg (average 14.5 mg) and amlodipine 2.5 to 7.5 mg (average 4.9 mg) were used to lower the clinical BP <140/90 mm Hg. BRS, evaluated by the spontaneous and the Valsalva methods, and clinical and ambulatory BP were evaluated at baseline and after 13 weeks of each treatment. A total of 47 patients (age 53.1 +/- 10.8 years, 51% male), 26 in the azelnidipine group and 21 in the amlodipine group, completed the study. For baseline and after therapy respectively, both Valsalva-BRS (4.8 +/- 1.7 vs. 8.4 +/- 3.1 msec/mm Hg, P = 0.001) and spontaneous-BRS (5.5 +/- 2.5 vs. 8.2 +/- 5.6 msec/mm Hg, P = 0.019) were increased by azelnidipine, but amlodipine did not change them. Clinical and awake BPs were similarly reduced by each drug therapy. In conclusion, BRS was increased by azelnidipine therapy, but not by amlodipine therapy. This differential effect may be important in cardiovascular risk reduction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]