These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Mechanical properties of respiratory muscles in primates.
    Author: Farkas GA.
    Journal: Respir Physiol; 1991 Oct; 86(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 1759052.
    Abstract:
    We examined the in-vitro mechanical characteristics of the diaphragm and parasternal intercostal muscles in adult baboons. At optimal length (Lo) the parasternal intercostal muscles were consistently faster than the diaphragm as judged by a shorter time-to-peak tension and a reduced twitch-to-tetanus ratio. However, maximal absolute force at Lo, corrected for cross-sectional area, revealed that the inherent strengths of both inspiratory muscles were identical (31.5 +/- 3.2 N/cm2 for diaphragm vs 29.5 +/- 1.1 N/cm2 for parasternal intercostals). Moreover, at submaximal stimulation rates, the parasternal intercostals produced significantly less tension at Lo than the diaphragm. At lengths less than Lo, however, the parasternal intercostal muscles generated significantly less tetanic tension than the diaphragm. These differences are similar to previously reported values in dogs (Farkas et al. (1985) J. Appl. Physiol. 59: 528-535). Thus, based on our findings, it appears that within a given species, the parasternal intercostals are quite different in mechanical terms from the diaphragm. Since both muscles are recruited at all levels of ventilation, including quiet breathing, these differences do not appear to be related to the activation levels. Moreover, since the present results were similar to those in dogs, the differences between both muscles do not appear to be affected or altered by body habitus.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]