These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Does the approach to the groin make a difference in hernia repair?
    Author: Günal O, Ozer S, Gürleyik E, Bahçebaşi T.
    Journal: Hernia; 2007 Oct; 11(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 17610024.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic and open preperitoneal hernia repair techniques both use the preperitoneal space. This study investigated whether the surgical approach to the inguinal canal affects outcome measures. METHODS: One hundred sixty patients with inguinal hernia were assigned randomly into open anterior (42), open preperitoneal (39), laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (39), and laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (40) groups according to the surgical method. The peroperative serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) levels, interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, VAS scores at 6 and 48 h, per- and postoperative complications, and recurrence rates were determined as main variables. RESULTS: The serum IL-6 levels were 335 +/- 1.8, 283 +/- 1.8, 283 +/- 1.4, and 269.3 +/- 1.6 pg/ml in the open anterior, posterior, transabdominal preperitoneal, and total extraperitoneal groups, respectively (P < 0.01). The TNF-alpha levels were highest in the open anterior group. The pain scores were lower in groups undergoing the posterior approach than in the open anterior approach group. CONCLUSION: The approach to the inguinal canal through the preperitoneal space appears to be less invasive than the transinguinal anterior approach.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]