These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Protection in specific pathogen free chickens with live avian metapneumovirus and Newcastle disease virus vaccines applied singly or in combination.
    Author: Ganapathy K, Cox WJ, Gough RE, Cargill P, Montiel E, Jones RC.
    Journal: Avian Pathol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 17620178.
    Abstract:
    This paper describes two experiments. In each experiment, 1-day-old specific pathogen free chicks were divided into three groups. In Experiment 1 - [avian metapneumo virus (aMPV) challenge] - one group served as unvaccinated controls; the second group was vaccinated with live aMPV (subtype B) vaccine only, and the third group received the aMPV vaccine in combination with live Newcastle disease virus (NDV) vaccine (VG/GA strain). Oropharyngeal swabs, tissues and blood samples were collected before and after challenge with a virulent subtype aMPV at 21 days post vaccination. Chicks were monitored for post-challenge clinical signs. Swabs and tissues were examined for the detection of challenge aMPV by virus isolation and by reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain reaction. Sera were assayed for antibodies against aMPV and NDV. The single and combined vaccinated chicks were all protected against clinical signs and no challenge virus was isolated from either of the vaccinated-challenged groups. In Experiment 2 (NDV challenge), as in Experiment 1, chicks were divided into three groups where one group remained as unvaccinated control and the other two groups were vaccinated as above, except that the second group received live NDV vaccine only, instead of aMPV. At 21 days post vaccination, 15 chicks from each of the three groups were removed to a different site and challenged with a virulent NDV (Texas GB strain). Re-isolation of the challenge virus was not attempted. All chicks in both NDV-vaccinated challenged groups were protected against clinical signs and mortality. These results show that, based on parameters monitored for the respective challenge virus, simultaneous application of live aMPV and NDV vaccines did not affect the efficacy of either vaccine.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]