These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Interfacial interactions of glutamate, water and ions with carbon nanopore evaluated by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Author: Cory SM, Liu Y, Glavinović MI.
    Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta; 2007 Sep; 1768(9):2319-41. PubMed ID: 17631857.
    Abstract:
    Molecular dynamics simulations were used to assess the transport of glutamate, water and ions (Na(+) and Cl(-)) in a single wall carbon nanopore. The spatial profiles of Na(+) and Cl(-) ions are largely determined by the pore wall charges. Co-ions are repelled whereas the counter-ions are attracted by the pore charges, but this 'rule' breaks down when the water concentration is set to a level significantly below that in the physiological bulk solution. In such cases water is less able to counteract the ion-wall interactions (electrostatic or non-electrostatic), co-ions are layered near the counter-ions attracted by the wall charges and are thus layered as counter-ions. Glutamate is concentrated near the pore wall even at physiological water concentration, and irrespective of whether the pore wall is neutral or charged (positively or negatively), and its peak levels are up to 40 times above mean values. The glutamate is thus always layered as a counter-ion. Layering of water near the wall is independent of charges on the pore wall, but its peak levels near the wall are 'only' 6-8 times above the pore mean values. However, if the mean concentration of water is significantly below the level in the physiological bulk solution, its layering is enhanced, whereas its concentration in the pore center diminishes to very low levels. Reasons for such a 'paradoxical' behavior of molecules (glutamate and water) are that the non-electrostatic interactions are (except at very short distances) attractive, and electrostatic interactions (between the charged atoms of the glutamate or water and the pore wall) are also attractive overall. Repulsive interactions (between equally charged atoms) exist, and they order the molecules near the wall, whereas in the pore center the glutamate (and water) angles are largely randomly distributed, except in the presence of an external electric field. Diffusion of molecules and ions is complex. The translational diffusion is in general both inhomogeneous and anisotropic. Non-electrostatic interactions (ion-wall, glutamate-wall or water-wall) powerfully influence diffusion. In the neutral nanopore the effective axial diffusion constants of glutamate, water and Na(+) and Cl(-) ions are all <10% of their values in the bulk, and the electrostatic interactions can reduce them further. Diffusion of molecules and ions is further reduced if the water concentration in the pore is low. Glutamate(-) is slowed more than water, and ions are reduced the most especially co-ions. In conclusion the interfacial interactions influence the spatial distribution of glutamate, water and ions, and regulate powerfully, in a complex manner and over a very wide range their transport through nanosize pores.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]