These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism discovered by multichannel biochemical screening: clinical course and considerations bearing on the need for surgical intervention.
    Author: Parfitt AM, Rao DS, Kleerekoper M.
    Journal: J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Oct; 6 Suppl 2():S97-101; discssion S121-4. PubMed ID: 1763676.
    Abstract:
    The sustained effects of biochemical screening to increase both apparent incidence and age at diagnosis indicate that, without screening, most patients with primary hyperparathyroidism would would never be diagnosed. This suggests that asymptomatic patients discovered as a result of screening have a nonprogressive form of the disease, with adverse health effects that are few or nontraditional, for which treatment policies validated only in symptomatic patients may be inappropriate. Accordingly, in 1975 we formulated criteria for withholding surgical treatment from such patients. Of 174 who were eligible for study over a 10 year period, clinical, biochemical, and densitometric assessment was repeated after at least 1 year (mean 52 months) in 106 patients who did not differ in any initial characteristic from 68 patients in whom follow-up was inadequate. There was no change in symptoms, no disease complications, and no change in any index of hormone secretion or disease severity. In 30 patients, individual regression slopes against time were not significant for any serum measurement. In these patients the disease appeared to have stopped progressing by the time the diagnosis was made, most likely because of cessation of tumor growth. There was a significant deficit in appendicular cortical bone at the time of diagnosis but no further acceleration of bone loss thereafter. In an earlier study, surgical cure was followed by a modest increase in forearm bone density for the first 6 months, but even after 3 years only about 20% of the deficit was corrected. The deficit in bone density is smaller in the spine than in the forearm and is not accompanied by any increase in vertebral fracture risk.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]