These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Treatment of the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Wirsung duct occlusion versus pancreaticojejunostomy].
    Author: Farsi M, Boffi B, Cantafio S, Miranda E, Bencini L, Moretti R.
    Journal: Minerva Chir; 2007 Aug; 62(4):225-33. PubMed ID: 17641582.
    Abstract:
    AIM: The aim of the study is to compare the results obtained using two different techniques of reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreatic remnant duct occlusion. METHODS: The authors describe a retrospective study performed in 44 nonselected patients submitted to pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2000 to 2004. They have been divided into 2 groups. Patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. The first group (22 patients) received pancreaticojejunostomy. The second group (22 patients) received duct occlusion with sclerosing glue. Intraoperative finding (operative time, estimated blood loss) and postoperative morbidity and mortality were evaluated. Endocrine and exocrine function were analyzed at 3 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Results showed no differences in median blood loss, duration operation and hospital day. Morbidity and mortality were higher in duct occlusion group; pancreatic fistula was more frequent after duct occlusion, but less dangerous than one from pancreaticojejeunostomy. Also exocrine function was better in anastomosis group and the incidence of diabetes mellitus was higher in patients with duct occlusion. CONCLUSION: Pacreaticojejunostomy is the procedure of choice, while duct occlusion should be performed in friable stump with small pancreatic duct (higher risk of pancreatic fistula).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]