These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Estimation of global and regional cardiac function using 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison study with echocardiography, gated-SPECT and cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Author: Wu YW, Tadamura E, Yamamuro M, Kanao S, Okayama S, Ozasa N, Toma M, Kimura T, Komeda M, Togashi K.
    Journal: Int J Cardiol; 2008 Aug 01; 128(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 17692410.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Sixty-four-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography (CT) has improved temporal resolution and reduced acquisition time. We aimed to evaluate the functional analysis using 64-slice CT comparing with echocardiography, electrocardiographically gated single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: Six-three patients (77.4+/-18.6 bpm) underwent 64-slice CT and CMR (echocardiography in 55; SPECT in 33) within 2 weeks were retrospectively reviewed. The left ventricular volumetric data from different methods were compared with CMR. Regional wall motion was compared between CT and CMR in a 17-segment and 4-point system (1=normal to 4=akinesis/dyskinesis). RESULTS: Ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) by CT agreed well with CMR (bias+/-SD, -0.22%+/-4.18, r=0.97;-0.59 mL+/-15.21, r=0.98; 1.09 mL+/-10.61, r=0.99) over a wide range of left ventricular (LV) function (EF 18-76% by CMR). Our results also showed good correlation of EF measured by CT and echocardiography (r=0.87) or SPECT (r=0.91, all P<0.0001); however, standard deviation of EF difference between CT and CMR was significantly less than echocardiography or SPECT (P<0.005). For regional wall motion, an exact agreement of 97% (kappa=0.91) was found between CT and CMR. CONCLUSION: Sixty-four-slice CT agreed well with CMR in LV function assessment, and had a superior accuracy than echocardiography and SPECT on EF estimation. Sixty-four-slice CT is considered a clinically acceptable and robust method to evaluate LV function.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]