These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; a retrospective 10-year study.
    Author: Herve J, Simoens Ch, Smets D, Ngongang Ch, Mendes da Costa P.
    Journal: Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(77):1326-30. PubMed ID: 17708247.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate results of laparoscopic cholecystectomies realized in our department and to compare results concerning local and general complications with those reported in the literature. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed retrospectively all the 1255 laparoscopic cholecystectomies realized in our department between January 95 and December 2004. Local and general complications were analyzed. Mean age was 55.6 (21-94) years, sex ratio (F/M) was 3.9. Common bile duct stones were extracted by endoscopic retrograde endoscopy (ERCP) before surgery or by choledochotomy (less than 1% of cases). The operation was performed with 4 trocars, as described by Dubois. RESULTS: Conversion rate was 1.95%. Mean postoperative hospitalization duration was2.7 days. Morbidity was 5.8% with equal repartition between local and general complications. Therevere 2 common bile duct injuries (0.16%). Six patients suffered from residual bile duct stone after cholecystectomy; 5 were treated by ERCP and 1 by choledochotomy. Three patients died (0.24%) after general complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecvstectomv is a common operation with potential possible dramatic complications. We think that a radiological study of the biliary tract must be performed before surgery to avoid mistakes during the operation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]