These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Analytical electric field and sensitivity analysis for two microfluidic impedance cytometer designs. Author: Sun T, Green NG, Gawad S, Morgan H. Journal: IET Nanobiotechnol; 2007 Oct; 1(5):69-79. PubMed ID: 17764376. Abstract: Microfabricated impedance cytometers have been developed to measure the electrical impedance of single biological particles at high speed. A general approach to analytically solve the electric field distributions for two different designs of cytometers: parallel facing electrodes and coplanar electrodes, using the Schwarz-Christoffel Mapping method is presented. Compared to previous analytical solutions, our derivations are more systematic and solutions are more straightforward. The solutions have been validated by comparison with numerical simulations performed using the finite element method. The influences on the electric field distribution due to the variations in the geometry of the devices have been discussed. A simple method is used to determine the impedance sensitivity of the system and to compare the two electrode designs. For identical geometrical parameters, we conclude that the parallel electrodes design is more sensitive than the coplanar electrodes.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]