These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: The comparison of cystatin C and creatinine as an accurate serum marker in the prediction of type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Author: Lee BW, Ihm SH, Choi MG, Yoo HJ. Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 78(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 17822797. Abstract: In a clinic-based, cross-sectional study of 320 type 2 diabetic patients, we staged the level of diabetic nephropathy (normoalbuminuric, microalbuminuric and macroalbuminuric stage) and estimated GFR based on serum creatinine and cystatin C (CysC). Serum creatinine and CysC levels were 0.91+/-0.21 mg/dL and 0.87+/-0.26 mg/L, respectively. Correlation coefficients between CysC-GFR and each of the creatinine-based GFR measurements (MDRD-GFR, Cockcroft-Gault-GFR, and CLcr) were 0.589, 0.569, and 0.479 (p<0.001). Serum CysC was significantly lower in normoalbuminurics (0.83+/-0.22) than in microalbuminurics and macroalbuminurics (0.94+/-0.33 and 1.05+/-0.28; p=0.004 and p<0.001). Of the estimations of GFR, significant differences among the groups were found on CysC-GFR and CLcr. CysC-GFR (mL/min) was statistically lower in macroalbuminurics (79.5+/-30.5) than in normoalbuminurics (104.3+/-30.9, p=0.01). The logistic regression analyses showed that retinopathy, A1C, CysC, diabetic duration, and CysC-GFR were indicators to predict the development of microalbuminuria. Serum CysC seems to be more accurate serum marker than serum creatinine in evaluating a prognostic stage of type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Our study suggests that, in Korean type 2 diabetic patients, CysC-based GFR might be more valuable than creatinine-based GFR in the prediction of the microalbuminuric stage.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]