MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Lack of effect of transrectal ultrasonography with restraint on lambing rate and prolificacy in ewes.
Author: Wurst AK, Dixon AB, Inskeep EK.
Journal: Theriogenology; 2007 Oct 15; 68(7):1012-6. PubMed ID: 17825900.
Abstract:
The objective was to determine if transrectal ultrasonography for determination of pregnancy in restrained ewes increases embryonic/fetal death or loss of pregnancy. Ten flocks (N=873 ewes) bred in either the estrous or anestrous season were randomized, into control (C) or examined (E) groups within flock. Examined ewes were placed in a tilting squeeze chute and scanned by one of three operators for pregnancy by transrectal ultrasonography once between Days 25 and 100 post-breeding. Control ewes were not subjected to handling in the squeeze chute or pregnancy diagnosis. Two operators counted embryos in E ewes in six flocks. There were no differences between E and C ewes in percent ewes lambing or lambing rate on a per flock basis. Prolificacy per flock was greater in E ewes (P=0.05; 1.53 versus 1.60, C and E, respectively) than in C ewes. Eighty-five percent of exposed ewes lambed in the estrous season, while only 62% of ewes lambed in the anestrous season (P=0.05). Overall prolificacy did not differ with season (1.60 versus 1.53), and there was no season by treatment interaction for any variable tested. Losses averaged 0.02 per E ewe exposed in the estrous season and 0.20 in the anestrous season (P<0.05). Examined ewes in this study had similar pregnancy and lambing rates to C ewes in the same flocks and prolificacy was slightly greater. Based on these data, the combination of transrectal ultrasonography with restraint is safe for pregnancy diagnosis in ewes.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]