These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Strengthening the academic base of general pediatrics fellowship programs: a national program and curriculum development project.
    Author: Baldwin CD, Szilagyi PG, Dreyer BP, Bell LM, Baker RC, Cheng TL, Coury DL, DeWitt TG, Darden PM, Duggan A, Ludwig S.
    Journal: Ambul Pediatr; 2007; 7(5):340-7. PubMed ID: 17870641.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To improve academic general pediatrics (AGP) fellowship programs by 1) developing curriculum guidelines and program standards and 2) creating a process for program review and consultation that might later be used for accreditation of AGP fellowship programs. METHODS: This project of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association (APA) created 4 documents: AGP fellowship program requirements, core curriculum, educational goals and objectives, and a standardized form to describe required program characteristics. Site visits were conducted at 7 volunteer AGP fellowship programs, selected for diversity of content, structure, and location. Evaluations were conducted using a uniform checklist of requirements that combined numerical ratings with a written evaluation summary. Feedback from programs on the review process enabled refinement of the documents. RESULTS: The site visits revealed great variety in emphasis among the 7 programs. In general, faculty were dedicated and capable, and programs showed considerable educational strengths. Typical problems were lack of integration of the program within departmental structures, overburdened faculty, and uncertain funding. Many programs demonstrated suboptimal curriculum planning and weak evaluation methods. Most program leaders felt that the project materials helped to improve the quality of their programs, and 5 of 7 programs expressed willingness to be involved in formal accreditation review in the future. CONCLUSIONS: AGP fellowship programs that volunteered for piloting of an accreditation process were diverse and vital, with rich educational offerings despite a lack of optimal curriculum structure, minimal evaluation, limited faculty resources, and tenuous funding. An APA accreditation process appears to be feasible and may enhance AGP fellowship programs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]