These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Upper cervical spine instability in pseudoachondroplasia. Author: Shetty GM, Song HR, Unnikrishnan R, Suh SW, Lee SH, Hur CY. Journal: J Pediatr Orthop; 2007; 27(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 17878785. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pseudoachondroplasia (PSACH) is a rare autosomal dominant skeletal dysplasia associated with os odontoideum and atlantoaxial instability. This study aims to define the characteristics of upper cervical spine instability in patients with PSACH and analyze the relation between the incidence of upper cervical instability and os odontoideum. METHODS: Fifteen patients (10 women and 5 men) with PSACH of Korean ethnicity with mean age of 23.7 years (range, 3-44 years) at presentation to our hospital with varied complaints, including short stature, limb deformity, neck pain, and neurological symptoms, were evaluated clinicoradiologically for upper cervical spine instability. The patients were separated into group 1 (n = 9) with os odontoideum and group 2 (n = 6) without os odontoideum. Comparisons were made using parameters such as instability index, rotational instability, atlantodens interval and space available for cord, and analysis done to correlate cervical instability with age and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. RESULTS: Significant differences were found statistically when the 2 groups were compared on the basis of the space available for the cord (SAC), JOA scoring, and rotational instability. Linear relationship was found between instability and age and JOA score. Incidence of os odontoideum was 60% in our study group. CONCLUSIONS: Os odontoideum led to an increase in the incidence of upper cervical spine instability. Instability increased with the age. The presence of os odontoideum and atlantoaxial instability did not warrant for surgery because no signs of cervical myelopathy developed or progressed in our patients during the follow-up period, but these patients should undergo regular clinical and radiological evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV prognostic study.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]