These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Reproducibility of nasal potential difference measurements in cystic fibrosis.
    Author: Yaakov Y, Kerem E, Yahav Y, Rivlin J, Blau H, Bentur L, Aviram M, Picard E, Bdolah-Abram T, Wilschanski M.
    Journal: Chest; 2007 Oct; 132(4):1219-26. PubMed ID: 17890478.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Nasal potential difference (NPD) measurement has been advocated as a diagnostic tool for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and as a method for assessing the response to new therapies. The purpose of this study was to examine the reproducibility of NPD measurements performed in a single center. METHODS: A total of 68 CF patients with a mean (+/- SD) age of 16 +/- 8 years (age range, 6 to 52 years) underwent NPD measurements on at least two occasions. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients with classic CF (mean age, 21 +/- 8 years) and 43 patients with nonclassic CF (mean age, 14 +/- 8 years) underwent sweat tests and NPD measurements. The mean sweat chloride values were 102 +/- 18 and 54 +/- 14 mEq/L, respectively, for classic CF and nonclassic CF groups. All patients underwent repeat NPD measurements. The basal NPD and the response to amiloride (DeltaAmil) and response to Cl(-) free and isoproterenol (DeltaCl(-) free + iso) were very similar in both measurements. In the classic CF group, the basal potential difference values were -40 +/- 12 vs -39 +/- 11 mV (p = 0.57), respectively, for the first and second measurements; 27 +/- 9 vs 26 +/- 10 mV (p = 0.55), respectively, for DeltaAmil; and 2.1 +/- 3.8 vs 0.4 +/- 2.9 mV (p = 0.07), respectively, for DeltaCl(-) free + iso. In the nonclassic CF group, the values were -32 +/- 13 vs -28 +/- 10 mV (p = 0.008), respectively; 19 +/- 10 vs 17 +/- 8 mV (p = 0.388), respectively; and -3.2 +/- 4.6 vs -3.3 +/- 4.4 mV (p = 0.876), respectively. CONCLUSION: When performed in a single center, NPD is a reproducible test for CF patients and thus may be a useful outcome measurement for assessment of the efficacy of new treatments.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]