These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Non-ossicular signal transmission in human middle ears: Experimental assessment of the "acoustic route" with perforated tympanic membranes.
    Author: Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN, Peake WT.
    Journal: J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2135-53. PubMed ID: 17902851.
    Abstract:
    Direct acoustic stimulation of the cochlea by the sound-pressure difference between the oval and round windows (called the "acoustic route") has been thought to contribute to hearing in some pathological conditions, along with the normally dominant "ossicular route." To determine the efficacy of this acoustic route and its constituent mechanisms in human ears, sound pressures were measured at three locations in cadaveric temporal bones [with intact and perforated tympanic membranes (TMs)]: (1) in the external ear canal lateral to the TM, P(TM); (2) in the tympanic cavity lateral to the oval window, P(OW); and (3) near the round window, P(RW). Sound transmission via the acoustic route is described by two concatenated processes: (1) coupling of sound pressure from ear canal to middle-ear cavity, H(P(CAV) ) identical withP(CAV)P(TM), where P(CAV) represents the middle-ear cavity pressure, and (2) sound-pressure difference between the windows, H(WPD) identical with(P(OW)-P(RW))P(CAV). Results show that: H(P(CAV) ) depends on perforation size but not perforation location; H(WPD) depends on neither perforation size nor location. The results (1) provide a description of the window pressures based on measurements, (2) refute the common otological view that TM perforation location affects the "relative phase of the pressures at the oval and round windows," and (3) show with an intact ossicular chain that acoustic-route transmission is substantially below ossicular-route transmission except for low frequencies with large perforations. Thus, hearing loss from TM perforations results primarily from reduction in sound coupling via the ossicular route. Some features of the frequency dependence of H(P(CAV) ) and H(WPD) can be interpreted in terms of a structure-based lumped-element acoustic model of the perforation and middle-ear cavities.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]