These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke.
    Author: Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M.
    Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1314-9. PubMed ID: 17908575.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability, concurrent and predictive validity, and responsiveness of the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) in hemiparetic patients after stroke. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: An early rehabilitation center for patients with neurologic disorders. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five nonambulatory patients after first-ever stroke, with duration of illness between 30 and 60 days, were included. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FAC, Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), walking velocity, step length, and six-minute walking test (6MWT) were assessed at the beginning, after 2 and 4 weeks of rehabilitation, and again 6 months later. After 6 months, community ambulation was also assessed. Test-retest and interrater reliability, concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity and responsiveness of the FAC were calculated. RESULTS: Based on video examinations, high test-retest reliability (Cohen kappa=.950) and interrater reliability (kappa=.905) were found. FAC scores at the beginning and after 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 6 months correlated highly with the RMI (Spearman rho=.686, rho=.787, rho=.825, rho=.893, respectively), distance walked in the 6MWT (rho=.949, rho=.937, rho=.931, rho=.906, respectively), walking velocity (rho=.952, rho=.939, rho=.902, rho=.901, respectively), and step length (rho=.952, rho=.932, rho=.896, rho=.877, respectively) at the same time points (all P<.001). The RMI, walking velocity, step length, and distance walked in the 6MWT differed for each FAC category (P<.001). After 4 weeks of rehabilitation, an FAC score of 4 or higher predicted community ambulation at 6 months with 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity. FAC scores changed significantly between the first 2 and second 2 weeks (Wilcoxon z=8.7, z=7.9, respectively; both P<.001) of the inpatient rehabilitation program. CONCLUSIONS: The FAC has excellent reliability, good concurrent and predictive validity, and good responsiveness in patients with hemiparesis after stroke.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]