These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Clinicopathologic significance and prognostic role of cyclin E and cyclin A expression in laryngeal epithelial lesions.
    Author: Fraczek M, Wozniak Z, Ramsey D, Zatonski T, Krecicki T.
    Journal: Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 128(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 17917837.
    Abstract:
    CONCLUSIONS: The determination of cyclin A expression might be helpful in the identification of laryngeal squamous cell cancer (LSCC) patients with increased risk of metastases. The results suggest that cyclin A may be a more informative marker for cell proliferation than Ki-67. Abnormalities of cyclin E and cyclin A may play an important role in LSCC development and progression; however, the expression of cyclin E does not seem to have prognostic significance. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to elucidate a possible association between cyclin E and cyclin A expression and clinicopathologic factors and their potential role as prognostic markers for patients with laryngeal epithelial lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Expression of cyclins E and A, and Ki-67 was examined immunohistochemically in a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded series of 46 LSCC; 23 epithelial dysplasias (ED); and 21 normal mucosae (NM). RESULTS: The mean labeling indices (LIs) for cyclin E in LSCC, ED, and NM were 10.6%, 4.9%, and 0%, and for cyclin A 27.2%, 17.5%, and 7%, respectively. In LSCC, a statistically significant correlation was found between enhanced cyclin A expression and a higher incidence of locoregional lymph node metastasis (p0.01). The enhanced expression of cyclin A was linked with cell proliferation in LSCC, ED, and NM. No association was observed between cyclin E and A and other clinicopathologic parameters or applied treatments. The prognostic significance of cyclin E, cyclin A, and Ki-67 in determining overall survival time showed no statistically significant differences.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]