These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Surgery for type A aortic dissection: long-term results and risk factor analysis].
    Author: Nardi P, Scafuri A, Pellegrino A, Bassano C, Zeitani J, Bertoldo F, Penta de Peppo A, Chiariello L.
    Journal: G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2007 Sep; 8(9):580-5. PubMed ID: 17972428.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Identification of risk factors may help prevent mortality and recurrence after surgical treatment of type A aortic dissection. METHODS: From January 1995 to March 2006, 100 consecutive patients (82 men, 18 women, mean age 58 +/- 12 years) with type A acute aortic dissection were submitted to replacement of ascending aorta (n = 62), arch (n = 27), or the aortic root (n = 11, 9 with the Bentall operation and 2 with the David aortic valve reimplantation). Patients were followed up for 48 +/- 33 months (range 1-120 months). RESULTS: Operative mortality was 18% for aortic root replacement, 24% for ascending aorta replacement, 26% for arch replacement, respectively (p = NS). Independent risk factors for operative mortality were: acute (p = 0.001) and chronic renal dysfunction (p = 0.02), advanced patient age (61 +/- 13 vs 56 +/- 13 years, p = 0.02), prolonged bypass time (p = 0.01). Antegrade cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermia during arch replacement was associated with better results than deep hypothermia (mortality 0/12 vs 7/15 patients, p = 0.008). Eight-year survival and freedom from cardiovascular events were 74 +/- 7.5% and 70 +/- 7.4%, respectively. Independent risk factor for late death was left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.50 (p = 0.02). Five out of 67 patients (7.5%) submitted to replacement of the ascending aorta with a tubular graft, who presented a dilated aortic root diameter (47 +/- 3.4 vs 40.4 +/- 4.9 mm, p = 0.004), were reoperated for proximal progression of the disease into the native aortic root (dilation n = 3, dissection n = 2) after 33 +/- 20 months (range 2-58 months). Proximal aorta reoperation was associated with markedly reduced 8-year survival (52 +/- 23 vs 82 +/- 7%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for acute aortic dissection represents an emergency treatment with satisfactory long-term results. Survival is affected by renal dysfunction at presentation, which should be aggressively treated, and by progression of the disease requiring reoperation; a dilated diameter of the aortic root should therefore indicate root replacement at the time of first operation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]