These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Level of satisfaction in patients with maxillary full-arch fixed prostheses: zygomatic versus conventional implants.
    Author: Peñarrocha M, Carrillo C, Boronat A, Martí E.
    Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):769-73. PubMed ID: 17974111.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate the satisfaction of patients with maxillary fixed prostheses supported by conventional and/or zygomatic implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients restored with complete maxillary implant-supported fixed prostheses were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups: those with at least 1 zygomatic implant (the zygomatic group) and those with no zygomatic implants (the nonzygomatic group). Twelve months after prosthesis delivery, subjects indicated their satisfaction with the new prosthesis on a visual analog scale. Prostheses were rated in terms of general satisfaction, comfort and stability, ability to speak, easy of cleaning, esthetics, self-esteem, and functionality. RESULTS: Forty-six patients participated in the study (23 in each group). The mean level of satisfaction was high; the groups differed significantly only in satisfaction with esthetics. Patients in the zygomatic group had a higher average score for esthetics than those in the nonzygomatic group. Those who had previously worn conventional removable prostheses gave a higher score for functionality to the implant-supported fixed prosthesis compared to the removable prosthesis. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with zygomatic implant-supported fixed prostheses was similar to that for fixed prostheses supported by conventional implants.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]