These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Training pediatric health care providers in prevention of dental decay: results from a randomized controlled trial. Author: Slade GD, Rozier RG, Zeldin LP, Margolis PA. Journal: BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Nov 02; 7():176. PubMed ID: 17980021. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Physicians report willingness to provide preventive dental care, but optimal methods for their training and support in such procedures are not known. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of three forms of continuing medical education (CME) on provision of preventive dental services to Medicaid-enrolled children by medical personnel in primary care physician offices. METHODS: Practice-based, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: 1,400 pediatric and family physician practices in North Carolina providing care to an estimated 240,000 Medicaid-eligible children aged 0-3 years. INTERVENTIONS: Group A practices (n = 39) received didactic training and course materials in oral health screening, referral, counseling and application of fluoride varnish. Group B practices (n = 41) received the same as Group A and were offered weekly conference calls providing advice and support. Group C practices (n = 41) received the same as Group B and were offered in-office visit providing hands-on advice and support. In all groups, physicians were reimbursed $38-$43 per preventive dental visit. Outcome measures were computed from reimbursement claims submitted to NC Division of Medical Assistance. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: rate of preventive dental services provision per 100 well-child visits. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURE: % of practices providing 20 or more preventive dental visits. RESULTS: 121 practices were randomized, and 107 provided data for analysis. Only one half of Group B and C practices took part in conference calls or in-office visits. Using intention-to-treat analysis, rates of preventive dental visits did not differ significantly among CME groups: GroupA = 9.4, GroupB = 12.9 and GroupC = 8.5 (P = 0.32). Twenty or more preventive dental visits were provided by 38-49% of practices in the three study groups (P = 0.64). CONCLUSION: A relatively high proportion of medical practices appear capable of adopting these preventive dental services within a one year period regardless of the methods used to train primary health care providers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00464009[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]