These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Interpreting changes in the epidemiology of anencephaly and spina bifida following folic acid fortification of the U.S. grain supply in the setting of long-term trends, Atlanta, Georgia, 1968-2003.
    Author: Besser LM, Williams LJ, Cragan JD.
    Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Nov; 79(11):730-6. PubMed ID: 17990332.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The prevalence of anencephaly (AN) and spina bifida (SB) was declining long before fortification of enriched grains in the U.S. with folic acid. We examined whether changes in these defects surrounding fortification could be distinguished from preexisting trends. METHODS: We used data from the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program to identify three ascertainment periods: Period 1 (1968-1981), prenatal diagnoses rarely made; Period 2 (1981-1993), prenatal diagnoses made but not ascertained; Period 3 (1994-2003), prenatal diagnoses ascertained. We compared the annual percent change (APC) in AN and SB for each period using Poisson regression, then compared prevalences during each period for categories of pregnancy outcome, sex, race, gravidity, and maternal age. RESULTS: The prevalence of AN (N = 434) and SB (N = 663) declined during 1968-2003. The APCs in Periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively, were -6.9%, -2.9%, and -6.8% for AN, and -7.1%, -7.0%, and -6.2% for SB; 95% confidence intervals around the APCs for Periods 2 and 3 overlapped for both defects. Prevalence ratios (PRs) for females relative to males decreased for AN (2.3 in Period 1; 1.2 in Period 3); PRs for whites relative to blacks or African Americans decreased for both AN (2.7 in Period 1; 1.2 in Period 3) and SB (2.5 in Period 1; 1.1 in Period 3). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that changes in AN and SB surrounding folic acid fortification (Period 3) could be part of preexisting trends. This must be considered when evaluating prevention efforts.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]