These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparison of CT and plain tomography in hilar and lung processes].
    Author: Reichler B, Hofmann-Preiss K, Tomandl B, Hohenberger W.
    Journal: Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():71-6. PubMed ID: 1799855.
    Abstract:
    A group of 100 patients including 46 patients with suspected bronchogenic carcinoma and 54 patients with suspected lung metastases was evaluated by conventional plain tomography. Patients with preoperatively suspected T4- or N3-categories were excluded. The diagnosis was confirmed in all cases by surgery and histology. In addition, patients with lung metastases were controlled by follow-up chest x-rays (median follow-up time 1.5 years). The diagnosis of plain tomography was true positive in 70% and false in 30%. CT was true positive in 57% and incorrect in 43%. Tumors or metastases were detected with both methods when more than 5 mm in diameter, lesions smaller than 5 mm were overlooked with CT and tomography. Plain tomography an CT did not detect lymph nodes metastases smaller than 1.0 cm.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]