These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Enhancing the examiner's resisting force improves the reliability of manual muscle strength measurements: comparison of a new device with hand-held dynamometry.
    Author: Lu TW, Hsu HC, Chang LY, Chen HL.
    Journal: J Rehabil Med; 2007 Nov; 39(9):679-84. PubMed ID: 17999004.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To develop and determine the reliability of a newly -designed resistance-enhanced dynamometer for muscle strength measurement, and to test the hypothesis that enhancing the examiner's resisting force improves the reliability of manual muscle strength measurements. DESIGN: An intra-examiner, inter-examiner, intra-session and inter-session reliability study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-five men (mean age 22.5 (standard deviation (SD) 1.7) years) were tested separately by 2 examiners using the resistance-enhanced dynamometer and a traditional hand-held dynamometer for an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study. Twenty-seven volunteers (mean age 22.1 (SD 0.8) years) were tested by a female examiner using the resistance-enhanced dynamometer for an intra- and inter-session reliability study. METHODS: Maximum resisting forces for the knee flexors and extensors were measured using the resistance-enhanced dynamometer and the traditional hand-held dynamometer. RESULTS: The traditional hand-held dynamometer had good intra-examiner reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.79-0.93) but poor inter-examiner reliability (ICC = 0.11-0.28). The resistance-enhanced dynamo meter had very good intra-examiner (ICC = 0.91-0.94), inter-examiner (ICC = 0.98), intra-session (ICC = 0.93-0.99) and inter-session (ICC = 0.91-0.92) reliability. The resistance-enhanced dynamometer also had better inter-examiner agreement (smallest real difference (SRD) 9-16% for resistance-enhanced dynamometer, 21-43% for traditional hand-held dynamometer). CONCLUSION: The resistance-enhanced dynamometer had very good reliability. Enhancing the examiner's resisting force appeared to improve the reliability of manual muscle strength measurements. The resistance-enhanced dynamometer is useful for muscle strength measurements in clinical practice.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]